Los Angeles DUI Attorney Blog

It’s been nearly two months since the implementation of the AB 91 pilot program, which mandates that first time Los Angeles DUI offenders install interlock ignition devices (IIDs) in their vehicles. So let’s assess whether this program has been helpful, harmful, or neutral.

A bit of background on AB 91 first.

Mike Feuer, a Los Angeles assemblyman, introduced the law, which requires that drivers convicted of DUI in Los Angeles, Tulare, Sacramento, and Alameda counties must put an interlock ignition device into their autos even after only one conviction. The compulsory device is wired into your ignition. So in order to start your car, you need to blow an essentially alcohol-free breath to show that you will not be DUI. (Your BAC reading must be 0.03% -- substantially lower than the legal limit for Southern California DUI of 0.08%). Once you do blow a successful sample, you must continue to blow samples as you drive, or your horns will start going off and your lights will flash to attract the attention of police.

Although AB 91 passed unanimously, many in the Southern California DUI community have voiced objections. One potential problem with AB 91 is that, according to DMV data, first time offenders do not respond as well to IIDs as do recidivist offenders. In other words, the statistics seem to show that if you put an IID in the car of a first time offender, it’s really not going to do much in terms of preventing that person from breaking the law again. That said, if you put an IID in the car of a recidivist (someone who has more than one conviction), then, the statistics suggest you’ll get results.

Since we are only less than two months into the AB 91 experiment, it’s difficult to say how effective the program will be. But five years down the road, we will likely have substantial data to help shape Los Angeles DUI policy.

If you have been charged according to California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) or 23152(b) for Los Angeles DUI, you need some fast and accurate legal guidance.

Continue reading "Mandatory IID Installment for 1st Time Los Angeles DUI Drivers: Will the Experiment Work?" »

Celebrity blogs and other media that cover Southern California DUI events have been bubbling over about the latest charges against former Wham! singer George Michael. The 47-year-old 80’s pop icon got arrested in London on July 4 after he crashed his Range Rover into a photo shop in London. The pop star tested negative for DUI but positive for driving under the influence of marijuana (in England the charge is called “unfit to drive through drugs”), and he now faces serious penalties, including potentially a long stint in jail.

George Michael has been investigated by police seven times over the past six years for driving related incidents. Three times, he has been found by police unconscious behind the wheel. The first was in February of 2006, when he received a citation for smoking marijuana. Months later, he crashed his vehicle after he fell asleep. A few months after that, he also fell asleep behind the wheel, allegedly due to drug use.

George Michael has publicly admitted to smoking 25 joints a day (although, allegedly, according to UK tabloid reports, he is down to “seven or eight” a day now). The Wham! star had been attending a London gay pride event before he smashed his truck into a store named Snappy Snaps.

The sad and disturbing travails of the 80’s pop star (whose real name is George Panayiotou) highlight how difficult it is for certain people to “get out of” destructive behavior cycles. Unfortunately for these recidivists, Beverly Hills DUI law does not take kindly to repeat offenders. Indeed, if, within 10 years time, you get convicted of two charges of Los Angeles DUI, you can face a two-year driver’s license suspension, mandatory 96 hours in jail, a year-and-a-half’s worth of alcohol school. The court may also impose additional penalties and restrictions – such as difficult probation terms.

Third time offenders can get increased penalties above and beyond that – including, most notably, 120-day minimum jail sentence.

Fourth time offenders get a minimum of 180 days in a county jail.

In certain multiple-DUI situations, what would ordinarily be a misdemeanor Hollywood DUI charge could be elevated to a felony – even absent any additional complications (such as hurting someone while DUI, causing serious property damage or being involved in a hit and run).

Whether you have a history of driving like George Michael, or you are a first time offender who is confused and scared, you could almost certainly benefit from a consultation with a trained and experienced Los Angeles DUI attorney.

Continue reading "Celebrity Los Angeles DUI Bloggers Muse Fate of George Michael, as Wham! Singer Slams into London Storefront" »

The annals of Southern California DUI news (and news about DUI from around the country) are filled with some seriously bizarre stories. This blog has attempted to highlight many of these. In particular, a disturbing (if accidentally humorous) trend that appears to be emerging is lawnmower DUIs. The latest lawnmower DUI arrest to hit the radar comes from Central Florida.

On the night of August 13, a man named Richard Paschen – who had three previous DUIs on his record and a suspended driver’s license – was caught by a Marion County Sheriff piloting his red lawnmower while under the influence of alcohol. The deputy who pulled him over, Gary Miller, told the press that Paschen admitted that he had had “a pretty good bit” to drink, and Paschen also had a cup full of beer with him in the lawnmower’s cup-holder. Paschen refused to take a breathalyzer test, and the officer arrested him and held him in Marion County jail under a bond of $30,500. Paschen’s defense: He claimed that he had gotten lost driving home.

It’s important to remember that you can get a Southern California DUI charge (and conviction) if you drive vehicles other than cars, trucks, and motorcycles. If you boat under the influence, that’s a crime, for instance. And this makes sense. When you pilot a complex and potentially dangerous piece of machinery, if you get distracted, uncoordinated, and uninhibited, you could cause serious damage to yourself and other people.

All that said, many people out there are confused about exactly what constitutes driving under the influence in Burbank (or elsewhere in the Southland), legally speaking. And this lack of knowledge about the law can be dangerous.

So let’s spell out once again what would be considered DUI in Burbank, according to California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) and 23152(b).

According to 23152(a), if the police catch you driving a motor vehicle (including a boat) while under the influence of illegal drugs or alcohol, you will be stopped and arrested and charged with a significant crime. Convicts will face myriad penalties, including California license suspension, fines and court costs, points on your license, jail time, and all sorts of secondary consequences coming off of that, such as higher insurance rates (which can add up to thousands of dollars over the long term), and problems getting hired and leasing an apartment or car.

So what should you do if you or someone you love has been pulled over and charged with a Burbank DUI? Rather than panic or procrastinate, connect quickly with a Los Angeles DUI lawyer who has the skills, knowledge, and wherewithal to help you develop a defense.

Continue reading "Los Angeles DUI Online Community Muses about Another Lawnmower DUI Arrest" »

Experts in Southern California DUI law try to pay attention to events that occur on the national radar as well as to local Southland news items. And a recent development in a heartbreaking case out of New York City has once again stoked debate and discussion among the community.

Below is the scoop.

Carmen Huertas was partying last October in Chelsea when she decided to load up her van with seven young girls and take them to the Bronx for a slumber party at her house. Unfortunately, Huertas had been drinking. Allegedly, she knew it too. According to testimony, she told her passengers “if you think I am going to crash, raise your hand!” Anyway, Huertas got onto the Henry Hudson Parkway and lost of her car control around West 96 Street. In the terrible crash that ensued, 11-year-old Leandra Rosado died.

Now, Huertas is prepared to enter a plea of guilty to the manslaughter charge against her in hopes that Justice Charles Solomon will be lenient. Justice Solomon has said in the past that he would give her something in between the maximum possible sentence of 15 years and minimum possible sentence of 1 year.

What happens if someone commits vehicular manslaughter while DUI in Glendale (or elsewhere in the Los Angeles area)? There are actually laws on the books that specifically handle Los Angeles DUI vehicular manslaughter. This occurs when a motor vehicle driver violates traffic laws or is careless or negligent -- and as a result of this carelessness or fault indirectly or directly causes the death of another human being.

There are degrees of vehicular manslaughter. One of the strongest charges is “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.” To prove this, the prosecutor must show that the defendant was more than just normally “negligent” – he or she had to have been “grossly negligent.” If you are convicted of this more serious charge, you can face 10 plus years in jail or longer for every person who died in the accident. Gross negligence is defined as recklessness that creates serious bodily injury and/or death. And a reasonable person would know that the behavior would create this kind of extreme risk.

Whether you have been charged with a very serious crime, such as gross vehicular manslaughter while DUI in Pasadena, or you have been pulled over for a more “run of the mill” (but obviously very sobering and scary) charge of driving under the influence in Beverly Hills with a BAC of 0.14%, you likely need comprehensive and strategic guidance with your legal defense.

When defendants research Los Angeles DUI attorneys, they typically feel significant pressure to make a choice quickly. But it’s important to find an attorney who has the experience, track record and capacity to deliver a superior defense for you.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Experts React to Guilty Plea in Prominent New York DWI Death Case" »

Last week, Jani Lane – the embattled former singer of the band Warrant – was finally sentenced for his Woodland Hills DUI of May 9th. The hair band singer pled no contest to charges and got 120 days in jail. He was also ordered to spend 30 months in an alcohol education program, and his license will be suspended for three years. As this blog reported when the "Cherry Pie" singer got arrested two months ago, the officer who stopped Lane for driving under the influence in Los Angeles was the same cop who busted him for his last Southern California DUI in 2009. (If you recall, for that misdemeanor charge, Lane got three months in alcohol school and three years probation).

The rocker’s jail sentence comes on the heels of other major breaking news in the celebrity Los Angeles DUI world – actor Chris Klein (of American Pie fame) may be facing jail time for his 2010 Southern California DUI arrest. And, of course, unless you’ve been living under a rock, you no doubt read that Lindsey Lohan finally checked into jail last Wednesday after being sentenced for violating probation associated with her 2009 Los Angeles DUI arrest.

What happens when people like Jani Lane get arrested multiple times for driving under the influence in Burbank, Woodland Hills, or really anywhere else in Southern California?

In short, the court has leeway to impose greater and greater penalties every time you get an additional conviction, as long as your previous DUIs occurred within the past 10 years. A first time offender in a typical case might be charged with a misdemeanor. The court could impose 48 hours minimum jail time – as well as a maximum of six months in jail. Remember, that’s without any other complicating factors, such as an injury. 1st time fines can max out at $1000 on top of court costs. You can get a 1-year driver’s license suspension, mandatory alcohol school, probation, and – as of July 1st -- mandatory interlock ignition device installation.

Second time Woodland Hills or Burbank DUI offenders get increased mandatory jail time – at minimum, four days; at maximum, 6 months. Your mandatory DUI alcohol school time goes up to 18 months, and your driver's license suspension goes up to two years. Your fines and court costs will also bump up.

After a third, fourth, and subsequent DUI convictions, you face incremental increases in your penalties as well as the potential for the court to elevate what would ordinarily be a standard misdemeanor Southern California DUI to a felony charge.

All this is to say that, if you face charges similar to Jani Lane’s, you probably want to consult with a credentialed Los Angeles DUI lawyer ASAP.

Continue reading "Major Jail Sentence Slapped on Jani Lane for Los Angeles DUI" »

Southern California DUI reporters have been furiously blogging the past week about the arrest last Saturday of Quinton Ganther, a runningback for Seattle Seahawks. The 25-year-old Ganther played for the Washington Redskins last season and rushed for more than 200 yards. The Seahawks signed him to compete to play on the 53-man squad as a reserve runningback.

According to the Seattle Times, Ganther was driving around 3:45 early Saturday morning near Sacramento when the California Highway Patrol (CHP) pulled him over and took him into custody. After a stay at the Sacramento County Jail, Ganther secured release by making a bail of nearly $1,500. Ganther’s Southern California DUI arrest is just the latest in a series of legal problems for Seahawks players. Leroy Hill, a teammate, was busted in April for charges of domestic violence and assault – he could be going to trial potentially this month. And Kevin Ellison, a safety, got arrested in May for possessing Vicodin tablets that he didn't have a prescription for. [Technically, Ellison was on the roster of the San Diego Chargers during that arrest. Subsequently, the Chargers waived his contract, allowing him to sign with the Seahawks.]

Whether you get pulled over for DUI in Long Beach, Laguna Beach, or Sacramento, police officers will (or at least should) subject you to similar treatment. In particular, they will look for so-called "symptoms" of Southern California DUI. Here is a partial list:

• Impaired motor skills
• Odor of alcohol or other intoxicants on the breath
• Eyes are watery and bloodshot
• Incoherent responses to police questions
• Problems fishing out a wallet or driver’s license
• General stumbling and fumbling
• Disheveled appearance
• Demeanor that's out of the ordinary – e.g. excitable, overly defensive, belligerent
• Incoherent explanation of where the person has been
• Admission to using alcohol, prescription medications, narcotics, or other substances.

If convicted of a charge of Long Beach DUI (or really, DUI anywhere in the Golden State), you can face a variety of scary penalties, including jail time, harsh fines, driver’s license suspension, mandatory alcohol school and probation. And that's all for a Los Angeles DUI conviction that's not further complicated by injury or serious property damage.

How much trouble are you in? And what can you do about your arrest?

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Blogs Buzz about Seahawks Runningback’s Arrest" »

Last Thursday, July 1, California's new test program to curb DUI in Los Angeles by compelling first time convicts to install interlock ignition devices (IIDs) went into effect. The pilot program will affect four California counties – Los Angeles, Sacramento, Alameda, and Tulare.

A study through the International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety found that convicts compelled to install IIDs were significantly less likely to get arrested again for driving under the influence. Local politicians celebrated this development – assemblyman Mike Feuer was quoted in the Associated Press saying that the law can "save hundreds of lives here."

The new DUI in Los Angeles punishment experiment will last for five years, after which time California lawmakers will analyze its efficacy and decide whether to expand the program – which is already at work in some fashion in 13 states across the country.

Los Angeles DUI offenders will, per the law, have to pay $125 to install the IID and $60 monthly to maintain it. Low income offenders may be granted some dispensation on these prices. On top of this, convicts must pay a one-time administrative fee for the IID of $45.

How will the number of convictions figure into the cost-calculus?

First time offenders -- will have to have devices in for at least five months. Based on the numbers quoted in the AP, that should add up to $470: $125(installation) + $45(fee) + $300(total monthly fees).

Second time Burbank DUI offenders -- will have the device installed for 12 months. That should be a total of $990: $125(installation) + $45(fee) + $720(total monthly fees).

Third time offenders -- will have an IID in for 24 months, bumping the total cost up to $1,710: $125(installation) + $45(fee) + $1440(total monthly fees).

Fourth time Southern Californian DUI offenders (within 10 years) -- will have to have an IID for 36 months: $125(installation) + $45(fee) + $2160(total monthly fees).

If a driver gets into an injury accident while DUI, the installation times will double.

What can you do if you or a loved one has been tagged with a charge of driving under the influence in Burbank? A skilled and battle-tested attorney can make a huge difference.

Continue reading " Los Angeles DUI Convicts to Face Mandatory Ignition Interlock Device Installation" »

As students of this blog know, the legal limit for Los Angeles DUI is a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08%. Well, Tom Lewand, the President of the Detroit Lions, got pulled over the Friday before last for driving with a BAC of 0.21% – nearly three times Detroit’s (and California’s) legal limit!

According to the police report, Lewand was driving in Denton Township to pick a buddy up – he was, ironically, to be the designated driver for their night out on the town. A deputy from the Roscommon County Sheriff’s Department pulled him over, noticed “a strong odor of intoxicants coming from the driver compartment of the vehicle” and subjected Lewand to field sobriety tests. Allegedly, Lewand quickly failed those – he lost his balance while trying to stand on one leg and failed the so-called “finger to the nose” test by touching his lip instead of his nose.

Despite the President’s claim that he had “not drank in a year-and-a-half;” subsequent to the incident, he promised that he was in “active recovery.” William Ford, the owner of the Lions, went on record as providing “full support” for his embattled President. If Lewand gets convicted, he can be subjected to significant penalties – not just according to Detroit state law but also according to the NFL, which must enforce its personal conduct policy.

If you get stopped for a Beverly Hills DUI, Pasadena DUI, or any other similar charge in Southern California, police will likely ask you to perform field sobriety tests similar to the ones that Lewand faced (and allegedly failed). Let’s quickly go over what these are.

Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) challenge the driver’s mental and physical coordination. The horizontal gaze nystagmus test measures how fast the driver’s pupils respond to a stimulus. Slow reaction time could indicate DUI. Other tests of physical coordination include the aforementioned one leg stand and finger to the nose tests as well as the Rhomberg test, in which a suspect must lean his/her head backwards and count up to 30.

A driver suspected of being DUI in Beverly Hills may also be asked to recite the alphabet backwards and to do other tasks to demonstrate mental awareness and competency. Finally, a police officer might look for behavioral and other clues that you might be under the influence, including odor of alcohol on or around you, bleary bloodshot eyes, slowness in responding to questions, and erratic temperament.

Responding effectively and proactively to a charge of Los Angeles DUI can make a world of difference in terms of what punishments the court hands out to you. An inept or inadequate defense can leave you facing significant jail time, huge court costs and fines, intense probation, and a lengthy suspension of your California driver’s license. On the other hand, if you work together with an experienced Los Angeles DUI defense attorney, you might be able to fight back against the allegations or, at the very least, get your punishment substantially softened.

Continue reading "Detroit Lions’ President Busted for Driving Nearly Three Times the Southern California DUI Limit" »

49-year-old Vince Neil, the lead singer for 80’s hair band Mötley Crüe, was detained last Monday in Las Vegas, after cops pulled him over for driving under the influence in a Ferrari on Las Vegas strip. Southern California DUI experts have been quick to point out that the singer has had multiple encounters with the law over drug and alcohol charges. In 1984, the singer pled guilty in a DUI vehicular manslaughter case, in which he accidently killed Nicholas Dingley, the drummer of Hanoi Rocks. For that crime, he paid out $2.5 million in restitution costs and spent 20 days in jail. Neil was also arrested in 2007 for reckless driving in a Lamborghini in Vegas. During his latest offence, reports TMZ, he was held at Clark County Detention Center prior to being released after posting a $2,000 bail.

If, like Neil, you drive DUI and cause someone’s death directly or indirectly– whether you drive DUI in Burbank on the 101 or DUI in Long Beach on the 405 – you could face severe punishment under California’s vehicular manslaughter laws. Prosecutors will look to police reports and the reports of investigators to determine whether to file vehicular manslaughter charges. One of the most serious offences is “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated” – this is a violation of the Judicial Council of California’s Penal Code section 191.5 (a). The conviction carries monumental penalties, including lots of jail time.

To prove that a person who was DUI in Burbank and killed someone violated Penal Code section 191.5 (a), prosecutors must prove four points:

1. The person drove under the influence of a drug, narcotic, or alcoholic beverage, or had a BAC level of 0.08% or greater.

2. While DUI or otherwise under the influence, the driver committed a driving infraction, misdemeanor or other act that could result in someone else’s death.

3. The driver committed that act, misdemeanor, or infraction with “gross negligence” – an extra degree of recklessness or carelessness.

4. Prosecutors must show that the grossly negligent behavior led – either directly or indirectly – to the actual death of another human being.

As you can see, charges of Southern California DUI can get quite complicated, and a defense can become quite convoluted, particularly if you cause injury to another person like Neil did in 1984.

To that end, to protect your rights, consider retaining experienced Los Angeles DUI defense counsel.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Blogs Light Up as Mötley Crüe Singer Busted for DUI in Vegas" »

Thomas Kinkade, a bestselling painter known for his gausy landscapes and overtly religious themes, was arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California on June 11 in Carmel. According to arrest reports, police pulled over the 52-year-old after they noticed that his 2006 Mercedes lacked a front license plate. An officer smelled alcohol on Kinkade’s breath and called in the CHP to conduct a field sobriety test. Kinkade allegedly failed these tests, and the police booked him into Monterey County jail.

Kinkade’s business dealings had already been under a cloud as result of ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. One of his two companies – Pacific Metro – filed bankruptcy less than two weeks before his Southern California DUI arrest. Kinkade is a self-made artist – he started selling his paintings in the parking lots of supermarkets. Today, he controls a not-unsubstantial artistic empire – or at least he did before his Morgan Hill Production company filed for Chapter 11.

When someone like Kinkade gets pulled over for driving under the influence in Pasadena, what kinds of Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) will he or she be subjected to? Here is a brief guide:

1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test

This is an eye examination -- a test for pupil reaction response. A slow response could indicate a Pasadena DUI.

2. Walk the Line

A suspect is asked to take several paces across a line (often a road divider). This is a balance test. If the driver cannot stay on the line, DUI may be suspected.

3. One Leg Stand Test

Another balance test. Suspect has to balance on one foot for a duration. Obviously, stumbling or falling might indicate DUI.

4. Rhomberg Test

Yet another balance test. The suspect must tilt his or her head backwards and count for a duration. Again: stumbling, tipping, or a loss of balance might indicate DUI.

5. Finger-To-The-Nose Test

Suspect must stretch her arms and attempt to touch her fingers to her nose with her eyes closed. If she misses her nose, DUI can be suspected.

Officers can also request a suspect to recite the alphabet in reverse or pass other tests of mental coordination. Failures, incoherent responses, and non-cooperation may all be construed to indicate potential intoxication.

Have you or a loved one has been pulled over for driving under the influence in Pasadena or elsewhere in Southern California?

Continue reading " Painter Thomas Kinkade Stopped for Southern California DUI" »

As this blog reported several months ago, reality TV star Jason Wahler (of The Hills and Laguna Beach fame) got pulled over for Southern California DUI in March and wound up pleading guilty. Despite earning penalties like 48 hours in jail, three months forced alcohol school, and three years probation, the recalcitrant reality star was arrested yet again last Sunday on charges of misdemeanor battery, after he allegedly hit a girl at a Hollywood party. E! News broke the story last Monday, citing sources who said that Wahler was arrested around 1:45 in the morning and held on a $20,000 bail pending an arraignment.

This marked the 23rd year old’s seventh arrest in the last several years and third arrest in 2010. (In addition to his Newport Beach DUI in March, he also got busted in Mexico for participating in a bar fight). Prior to the Hollywood brouhaha, Wahler had allegedly been in talks to appear on Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew (on VH1). It is unclear whether he will now be invited on the show.

What happens when someone like Wahler gets charged with multiple counts of driving under the influence in Beverly Hills (or elsewhere in California)? Well… first we must note that Wahler was only busted once in 2010. If a defendant gets convicted multiple times for Southern California DUI, charges obviously increase.

For a first-time misdemeanor offense, the court might impose penalties like 48 hours of jail time, a fine of $1,000 along with court costs, a one-year suspension of a California driver’s license, and compulsory DUI alcohol school.

A second time misdemeanor offender may see a minimum of four days in jail (perhaps more), a two-year license suspension, a serious increase in court costs and fines, and additional compulsory alcohol school along with tougher probation terms.

If you are busted for driving under the influence in Hollywood a third time within 10 years, your jail time jumps up to 120 days minimum, and all other punishments increase – including driver’s license suspension (three years), alcohol school, probation, etc.

A fourth time DUI within 10 years – even one that would ordinarily be considered a misdemeanor – may be elevated to a felony and can merit a minimum of 180 days in jail along with other severe punishments.

How can you or a loved one battle back against spurious charges of driving under the influence in Hollywood or elsewhere in Southern California?

Whether you believe that a breathalyzer test erroneously showed you to be DUI, or whether you admit to driving DUI but seek to minimize your punishments and maximize your chance for rehab, you likely need a professional Southern California DUI defense attorney to guide you.

Continue reading "Jason Wahler Socked with Seventh Arrest – New Charges against Celeb Who Was Arrested for Southern California DUI in March" »

An unfortunate number of Southern California DUI cases involve athletes, politicians, actors, and other celebrities. But the Southland isn’t the only place where tragic accidents happen. Indeed, Southern Florida has also played host to a cascade of DUI tragedies involving celebrities (from hip-hop moguls to athletes). On May 24th, a settlement was announced in one of the most heart-rending recent DUI cases – Jim Leyritz, a former major leaguer who played for the Yankees and five other teams, settled for $350,000 pertaining to a DUI related car crash that left a Florida women, Fredia Veitch, dead.

The December 2007 crash occurred in Fort Lauderdale at 3 in the morning. Veitch had been a passenger in Leyritz’s car. Both were under the influence, and neither had been wearing a safety belt. According to the terms of the settlement, Leyritz’s insurance company will pay out $0.25 million to Veitch’s family at a rate of $1,000 a month for 100 months. Later this year, Leyritz is scheduled to face DUI manslaughter charges. Although he earned upwards of $10 million from playing in the major leagues, according to the plaintiff’s attorneys, he no longer has significant assets aside from his MLB pension.

A charge of Southern California DUI manslaughter can lead to extended jail time as well as a host of other penalties. But did you know that Southern California DUI law distinguishes between DUI manslaughter due to ordinary negligence and DUI manslaughter due to gross negligence? This distinction is important, particularly when it comes to sentencing.

If prosecutors can prove that you violated Penal Code Section 191.5(a) (gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated), you can wind up with a much longer sentence. So the debate over whether you exhibited “gross negligence” or not becomes key. A Long Beach DUI attorney can help you challenge charges by digging into toxicology reports, taking statements from witnesses and vetting them, analyzing police reports, and otherwise searching for evidence or arguments that can exonerate you or at least reduce the severity of the charges.

Of course, any charge of Southern California DUI manslaughter – whether it involves a baseball player or a non-celebrity – requires delicate and sympathetic handling. A seasoned attorney can provide a powerful defense.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Blogs Report on Wrongful Death Settlement in Case Involving Major League Ball Player" »

Shaun Palmer, a 41-year-old snowboarding legend, was arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California last Wednesday in South Lake Tahoe. According to local police reports, the snowboarder was arrested along with seven other people in a standard DUI patrol. Cinco de Mayo 2001 saw elevated numbers of arrests across the Southland. In Phoenix, AZ, a valley patrol picked up 171 people for driving under the influence – with an average BAC of 0.141%, nearly twice the legal limit for Los Angeles DUI.

Palmer is no stranger to alcohol-related legal troubles. Four years ago, Lake Tahoe police pulled over a car in which Palmer was a passenger. The female driver was tagged for driving under the influence in Southern California. Palmer insisted on going to jail with her. So the police arrested him for being intoxicated in public. In a separate incident in 2008, Palmer was again arrested on public intoxication charges after he intervened in a fist-fight at a local beach.

X-Games legend Shaun Palmer was only charged once with Southern California DUI – his other two arrests were for public intoxication. But what happens when someone is actually convicted of multiple Los Angeles DUI charges within 10 years?

As you might expect, the penalties ratchet up. First time offenders can face 48 hours in jail time (mandatory), $1,000 in fines on top of other court related costs, a one year driver’s license suspension, six weeks minimum alcohol school, and other terms of probation. For instance, police may be able to search you without reason while you are on probation. In addition, you may be forbidden to drink alcoholic beverages during your probation.

Second time Burbank DUI and Glendale DUI offenders get stricter punishments: a minimum jail sentence between 4 and 10 days, 18 months minimum alcohol school, two years California driver’s license suspension, and higher fines and court costs. If you are convicted three or more times within 10 years, your penalties really go up. For instance, you will get a mandatory minimum of 120 days in jail – that’s nearly four months. A fourth time DUI conviction can even be considered a felony – even if there are no complicating factors, such as an injury to another driver.

Whether you have been arrested for your first Glendale DUI or your second or third charge within 10 years, nothing can replace the guidance of a proactive, court-savvy DUI defense attorney. Without good guidance, you could easily complicate your case and wind up with a harsher sentence than you might deserve.

Continue reading " Cinco de Mayo Southern California DUI Arrest for Shaun Palmer, X-Games Champion" »

In an ironic Los Angeles DUI case, Miguel Santana, a 40-year-old LA city administrator, has been charged with driving under the influence in Southern California following an evening of partying with none another than District Attorney Steve Cooley. Last Monday, Cooley’s office filed Los Angeles DUI charges pursuant to Santana’s March 26th arrest in Covina for driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.15%.

Santana, who wields extensive budget authority for Los Angeles, attended an American Diabetes Association fundraiser at a Marriott Hotel along with DA Cooley on March 26. He left the party in a city-owned car and got stopped and arrested by the CHP (California Highway Patrol) in Covina. Santana made a $5,000 bail and issued a public apology the following morning. In the wake of the arrest, Santana entered an alcohol treatment program, turned into his city car, and took a temporary leave to deal with his legal situation. He went back to work on April 15th. A May 25th arraignment has been scheduled.

According to the DA office’s allegations, Santana had a BAC of 0.15%. What exactly actually does Southern California DUI law say about BAC levels?

Two California Vehicle Code Sections are critical: CVC Section 23152(a) and CVC Section 23152(b). 23152(a) says that a driver stopped while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can face criminal charges -- either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on circumstances. If you get convicted of multiple DUIs within a 10-year period, or if you injure someone during the commission of a Pasadena DUI, for instance, you may face a felony. Punishments can include a loss of California driver’s license, major fines, and mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device in your car.

23152(b) defines driving under the influence in Glendale (or elsewhere in Southern California) “per se” as driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher. In Santana’s case, his BAC of 0.15% was nearly twice the legal limit – perhaps high enough over the limit for him to face additional charges on top of standard misdemeanor Southern California DUI.

What Can You Do If You or a Loved One Faces Similar Charges?

Legal options abound. But if you don’t take smart and decisive steps to build a strategic defense, you could wind up facing harsh penalties that can follow you for years.

Continue reading "Administrative Officer Charged by DA’s Office with Los Angeles DUI – After Leaving Party Hosted by the DA Himself!" »

In the annals of arrests for driving under the influence in Southern California, the March 3 bust of 56-year-old Roy Ashburn for driving with a BAC of 0.14% in Sacramento wouldn’t stand out as particularly noteworthy -- but for two salient points:

1. Roy Ashburn is a State Senator from California (a representative of District 18).
2. The Senator was busted after leaving a gay bar called Faces with a young male Latino in his car -- this in spite of his pronounced anti-gay voting record and the fact that he had been married with five children.

In the wake of the arrest, Ashburn quickly confessed to the press the he was gay. He justified his 12+ years of Assembly and State Senate voting against gay rights by saying that he was simply following the wishes of his conservative constituents. Southern California DUI bloggers have noted that the Republican senator’s ordeal has rhymed closely with the travails of other recently outed Republicans, like evangelical Ted Haggart and senator Larry Craig, who was caught playing footsie with a federal agent in a public men’s room.

According to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) and 23152(b), most first time offenders will be charged with a misdemeanor. The court has an array of punishments at its disposal, including mandatory time in custody (48 hours), fines of up to $1,000 in addition to court costs, mandatory suspension of California vehicle license for a full year, mandatory alcohol school, formal probation, and mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device in your car or truck.

Ashburn was given 2 days jail time -- one of which he served while being in custody during arrest. The other day will involve him working for the Sheriff's Department. He also has to pay fees and costs of around $2,000, and he will face three years of probation.

According to the senator’s spokesman, Ashburn “accepts full responsibility for his actions [and wants to be] treated like any other resident of California would be treated.”

Although few would argue that the senator got off “easy” for what he did, others charged with similar crimes of driving DUI in Glendale or DUI in Burbank can wind up with much more serious penalties, including longer stints in jail, harsher terms of probation, and much higher costs and fees.

In fact, if you injure someone while driving DUI in Glendale, and the prosecution can prove that your driving DUI led to an accident that caused the injury, you can be charged under California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 23153(a) and 23153(b), which could elevate your misdemeanor to a felony charge. If convicted, you could be stripped of your right to vote and forced to spend longer time in jail.

So what can you do if you’ve been hit with a Burbank or Glendale DUI charge?

Continue reading " Southern California DUI Punishment Update -- State Senator Roy Ashburn Given Jail Sentence for March 3rd DUI" »

Southern California DUI headlines about indiscreet celebrities and sports figures capture a sizable (perhaps undue) slice of the American attention span. But today we are reporting on a story that’s potentially even more bizarre than the standard Lindsay Lohan DUI or Paris Hilton DUI type affairs.

A breaking story out of Reno, Nevada has lit up the blogosphere -- even though no celebrities, sports figures, or even politicians were involved. Why all the fuss? Because it involves two men simultaneously arrested for driving under the influence in one stop.

The back-story

Last Tuesday, a motorist called the Reno police after he saw an SUV weaving around the road near Sparks Steakhouse (near McCarran Boulevard in North Reno). The motorist saw the SUV stop. The passenger hopped out of the vehicle, walked around to the driver, pulled him out and then carried him like a sack of potatoes back to the passenger side. The passenger then got into the driver’s seat and drove away.

By this time, police had arrived -- in time to see the new driver (the former passenger) veering erratically over the road. Police pulled over the SUV and tested both men -- Michael Yell and David Dudick -- both of whom tested three times over the state’s legal limit of 0.08%.

“Double dip” Southern California DUI stops occur infrequently -- but this incident out of Reno was not even the first of its kind that this blog has covered (if you recall, several months ago, we reported on a husband and wife who both got arrested for driving under the influence in Los Angeles at the same stop -- although each was driving a different car).

Two statutes govern Long Beach DUI charges.

The first, California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) defines the term “driving under the influence” as a crime that can lead to your arrest. It also stipulates the many consequences that await convicts, including driver’s license suspension, fines and court costs, points on your license, jail time, and mandatory alcohol education. (The statute does not, obviously, talk about the secondary fallout from these primary punishments -- such as increased insurance rates, potential difficulties with employers, and so forth -- but convictions under the statute can have long-term and complex consequences).

The second, California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b), defines DUI “per se” as driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or greater. California Vehicle Code Section 23578 defines so-called excessive blood alcohol content as a BAC of 0.15% or higher. This may lead to a DUI penalty enhancement -- in other words, your punishments can be even greater than they might be for a standard BAC violation.

Whether you were arrested under suspicion of driving under the influence in Long Beach, Burbank, Glendale, or elsewhere in Southern California, you will likely want an attorney to represent you through the various phases of your defense. Do not underestimate the power of prosecutors. The state tends to be particularly aggressive with DUI suspects.

Continue reading "More Peculiar than Even a Celebrity Los Angeles DUI -- Case Out of Reno in Which Both Passenger and Driver Arrested Simultaneously for DUI!" »

Across the blogosphere, reporters who cover celebrity Los Angeles DUI events have been chiming in with opinions about the arrest of Rod Strickland, an Assistant Coach for Kentucky’s basketball team and former NBA star (17-year NBA veteran, in fact). The 43-year old Strickland was arrested at 3 a.m. on April 13th in Lexington, Kentucky after police saw him run a red light.

Per court documents, Strickland failed a breathalyzer test. Police remanded him to the Fayette County Detention Center on charges of driving under the influence, running a red light and lacking registration and insurance.

Strickland has run afoul of the law numerous times over the past several years:

o In 1994, he and a fellow teammate on the Portland Trailblazers got into a fistfight with a truck driver, earning Strickland a misdemeanor battery charge.
o In 1998, Strickland collected his first DUI conviction.
o In 1999, while with the Wizards, he collected another DUI and reckless driving charge but managed to get acquitted.
o In 2001, in Virginia, Strickland got arrested for driving under the influence again.

The laws governing Kentucky and Southern California DUI matters are different in significant ways. Let’s look at a common test for Los Angeles DUI -- the famous Breathalyzer Test.

The breathalyzer is a handheld device that intakes a suspect’s breath and chemically analyzes it to determine its alcohol content. From the sample, analysts extrapolate a BAC number (blood alcohol concentration). If your BAC is at or above 0.08%, you can be found in violation of the California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) and suffer a range of penalties, including court costs and fines, jail time, mandatory alcohol school, probation, and forced installation of an interlock ignition device.

Breathalyzers are not error-free, however. Indeed, a surprising variety of factors can interfere with test results. Men and women process alcohol differently and at uneven rates. Breathalyzers do not distinguish between ethanol -- the active ingredient in alcoholic beverages -- and certain other chemicals. Diabetics may blow false positives due to chemicals in their breath. Different exhalations can yield different BAC readings -- even from the same person taken at the same time! And calibration problems, administration problems, inadequate care of machinery and mis-reading the instrument can all lead to false positives -- and that can mean false convictions for Southern California DUI charges.

But what if a breathalyzer said you had a BAC above 0.08%? Will you be stuck with a Burbank DUI or Glendale DUI charge? Or can you do something to fight back and prove your innocence?

Defendants do have options to battle back. A reliable, trial-proven lawyer can investigate your breathalyzer test results and determine whether they can be challenged on any number of grounds. He or she can also devise a comprehensive strategy to dispute your Burbank DUI charge -- or at least provide a best-case defense for you.

Continue reading "Celebrity Los Angeles DUI Reporters Obsessed with Former NBA Star’s New DUI" »

Joey Porter, a linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals, was arrested for Southern California DUI last week in Bakersfield near a Taco Bell. The 33-year-old allegedly got into a confrontation with the officers who arrested him – slapping a police officer’s hand when the officer opened his car door – but DUI allegations against the athlete have been dropped, according to the local Deputy DA.

According to reports, Porter tested right around the limit for Southern California DUI – different readings gave BACs at 0.07% and 0.08%. Prosecutors did not believe they had unambiguous evidence to convict. Deputy DA Mark Pafford was quoted in a Bakersfield paper about the matter: “We do not believe that there will be a reasonable likelihood that a jury would find Mr. Porter guilty… we thought it was not appropriate for us to proceed.”

Interestingly, apparently Porter had been pulled over at the same time as his friend had been pulled over – the double stop may have complicated the investigation and would certainly have made any kind of trial (if it had come to that) more complex.

Porter’s case of Southern California DUI aside, how exactly do breathalyzer tests determine whether or not prosecutors press for charges like DUI in Glendale?

The breathalyzer test is the most common type of BAC test employed in the Greater Los Angeles area. Theoretically, breathalyzer tests should work easily. All a suspect has to do is blow into a machine, which analyzes the breath and determines based on chemical methods how much alcohol is in the person’s blood stream. If that alcohol concentration is above a certain magic number – in California that number is 0.08% – then that person should be tried and ultimately convicted for DUI in Glendale (or wherever).

In practice, however, it’s not simple. Breathalyzer readings are subject to all sorts of errors. First of all, machines do not discriminate between men and women, between sick people and healthy people, and between people with different metabolisms. Deeper breaths into a machine may yield higher readings, and even false positives for DUI in Southern California. The machines can be misread. Officers can screw up the paperwork and record numbers incorrectly. Other chemicals in the blood or even on the machine can interfere with readings. And so on and so forth.

The inherent flaws in breathalyzer testing notwithstanding, if you have been charged with DUI in Pasadena, you likely need an expert attorney to help you navigate the legal system. It’s not enough simply to argue that “The breathalyzer test was wrong!” Unless you have evidence and argumentation to back up your claim, and unless you understand the proper legal protocol to defend yourself, justice may not be served.

Fortunately, you don’t have to go down this road alone.

Continue reading "Joey Porter will not be charged with Southern California DUI" »

23-year old Jason Wahler was arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California last Friday night – just one week after he was arrested in Mexico for getting into a fight at a nightclub in Cabo San Lucas.

According to the arrest reports, the former boyfriend of both Lauren Conrad and tennis superstar Katja Decker-Sadowski was pulled over just before 11 o’ clock on Friday in his Chevy Tahoe in Newport Beach. Details of this arrest are hazy. More is known about Wahler’s previous arrests – which include a charge last year of assault in Seattle, Washington and a 2008 charge of assault after he socked a tow-truck driver in the face.

Wahler is no stranger to rehab – he was quoted in People Magazine saying, “I’m embarassed as hell, but I really do not remember my arrests. They’re blackouts. And that’s scary.”

Some of the snarkier blogs that cover stories about celebrity DUI in Los Angeles have noted that Wahler’s attempt at rehab in 2007 does not seem to have been successful.

The 23-year old’s multiple arrests do beg the question – what happens to someone who violates laws against DUI in Long Beach more than once?

Unsurprisingly, it turns out that the law ratchets up the punishments every time you get arrested for an additional charge of DUI in Los Angeles.

Long time readers of this blog will realize that we like to review the various kinds of punishments that can be doled out for driving under the influence in Long Beach. We think that knowledgeable drivers are empowered drivers. To that end, once more, let’s review what the court can impose for different DUI offences.

First time DUI – 48 hours in jail, $1,000 in fines plus court costs, CA drivers license suspension for one year, six weeks minimum of alcohol school, potentially formal probation imposed, mandatory installation of Interlock Ignition Device.

Second time DUI – mandatory 4 to 10 days behind bars, more court costs and fines – usually significantly steeper, 18 months minimum of alcohol school, two years of CA drivers’ license suspension, IID installation, and strict probation possible.

Third time DUI – 120 days behind bars, 18 months mandatory DUI alcohol school, three years California drivers license suspension, huge spike in court costs and fines, and more.

Fourth time DUI within ten years – could easily be elevated to a felony, 180 days minimum in jail, three year drivers license suspension, 18 months alcohol school minimum, four year drivers license suspension, another steep increase in court costs and fines, and more.

If you have been charged with a second, third, or fourth count of driving under the influence in Los Angeles, you may need legal representation ASAP.

Continue reading "Another Star of the Hills Busted for Driving Under the Influence in Southern California" »

Sports reporters from ESPN and independent bloggers who cover celebrity Los Angeles DUI stories are demanding more information about the arrest of New York Yankees Senior VP, Mark Newman, who was pulled over last Monday for driving under the influence in Florida.

Newman, who has served the Yankees for over two decades in player development, was pulled over for DUI in Tampa and taken to Hillsborough County Jail, according to the AP. He allegedly did not take a blood alcohol test and got released after posting a $500 bail. An AP reporter left a message on Newman’s cell phone, which the executive did not return.

The Yankees have been working overtime to do damage control. The organization released this short statement 24 hours after the stop: “the team is taking the situation seriously and is looking into the matter.”

With so many incidents of athlete Los Angeles DUI in the news lately – just scroll through this blog, for instance, to see a veritable roster of A-List athletes in trouble – many bloggers and sports commentators are not satisfied with the dearth of information about Newman’s arrest. Here you have the Senior VP of Operations for the Yankees bustled for DUI, and yet the press only prints half a paragraph about the story.

Have we become so inured to stories about celebrities being busted for driving under the influence in Burbank (and elsewhere) that we no longer have the patience to track all the different instances of athlete DUI? What can be done to slow the flood of DUI arrests -- not just among athletes and celebrities but also among “common” citizens?

We believe that if people understood the law clearer, we would likely see fewer instances of DUI in Burbank (and elsewhere) and better driving in general. After all, studies show that simply attending to information can change behavior. Monitor the amount of power your home uses, for instance, and you will cut back on your energy uses subconsciously. So, if people spent more time just thinking about Southern California DUI laws, perhaps this could alter behavior in a positive way. And that’s partly what we are trying to do here with this blog.

To that end, let’s take another look at California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) and 23152(b). These laws spell out precisely what it means to drive DUI in Burbank and elsewhere in Southern California. They also stipulate the punishments that convicted offenders could get – these range from jail time to fines and court costs to strict probationary terms to mandatory installation of Interlock Ignition Devices (IIDs).

23152(b) stipulates a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above 0.08% as the so-called “legal limit.” If you drive with a BAC of 0.08% or higher, that means that you are driving DUI.

Responding to charge of Los Angeles DUI

Continue reading "Sports Reporters and Celebrity Los Angeles DUI Bloggers Demand More Information about Yankees Executive’s Arrest" »