DUI Probation Violation

July 19, 2010

Lindsay Lohan gets Jail Time for Violating Los Angeles DUI Probation Terms

When the flurry of news about Lindsay Lohan’s 90-day jail sentence for violating her Los Angeles DUI probation hit the fan a few weeks ago, this blog deliberately avoided covering it because there was simply too much sensationalism about it in the press. However, given the layers and twists and turns that the story has been taking, any blog devoted to covering news related to driving under the influence in Southern California would be remiss if it did not address the latest developments in the case.

Last week, Lohan hired Robert Shapiro, the criminal defense attorney who once represented O.J. Simpson. She also checked into a rehab facility that the famous lawyer set up. Lohan faced flack (and some praise) from fans and celebrity gossipmongers for her covert communications (via drawing on her hands) and general histrionics.

Obviously, without knowledge of the details of her Southern California DUI case, it is not fair to weigh in one way or another. That’s a key point. You really have to be careful about what you read in the media, as news stories automatically tend to oversimplify and skew coverage. Although the American legal system operates on the principle of “innocent until proven guilty,” often, the public press works on just the opposite principle – guilty until proven innocent.

All this is to say that, if you or a loved one faces a similar battle against a charge of Hollywood DUI, you want facts and strategic guidance – not opinions and theories based on hearsay.

For instance, how well do you know the penalties for Southern California DUI? As you may have read, Lohan got approximately three months in jail for violating the terms of her probation. But what exactly does that mean? What do convicted DUI offenders typically face, punishment-wise? Does the court have leeway? Can your lawyer help reduce your sentence? And what happens if you collect more than one DUI? These are all critical questions – and the answers can be dynamic. That’s why having a Hollywood DUI attorney provide good strategic guidance can be crucial. That said, let’s just review again some basic parameters.

First timers could get the following penalties: 48 hours in jail (max six months), $1,000 in fines and court costs, California driver’s license suspension of a year, mandatory six weeks or more DUI alcohol school, formal probation imposed, and a mandatory interlock ignition device installation (as of July 1, 2010).

Second time convicts (within 10 years) face jacked up penalties, such as at least four days in jail instead of 48 hours, a minimum of 18 months in DUI alcohol school as opposed to six weeks, a two-year driver’s license suspension as opposed to one year, increases in court costs and fines, and likely stricter terms of probation.

And as you get more and more DUIs within a 10-year period, your penalties increase incrementally. Under some circumstances – for instance, if you cause an injury to someone while DUI in Hollywood – your charge could be elevated from a misdemeanor to a felony.

The point is, whether you are a high profile defendant on the order of Ms. Lohan or whether you face a “workaday” Los Angeles DUI charge, you really need expert guidance to try to minimize your sentence and maximize your chances for a healthy and safe recovery.

June 14, 2010

Jason Wahler Socked with Seventh Arrest – New Charges against Celeb Who Was Arrested for Southern California DUI in March

by Michael Kraut

As this blog reported several months ago, reality TV star Jason Wahler (of The Hills and Laguna Beach fame) got pulled over for Southern California DUI in March and wound up pleading guilty. Despite earning penalties like 48 hours in jail, three months forced alcohol school, and three years probation, the recalcitrant reality star was arrested yet again last Sunday on charges of misdemeanor battery, after he allegedly hit a girl at a Hollywood party. E! News broke the story last Monday, citing sources who said that Wahler was arrested around 1:45 in the morning and held on a $20,000 bail pending an arraignment.

This marked the 23rd year old’s seventh arrest in the last several years and third arrest in 2010. (In addition to his Newport Beach DUI in March, he also got busted in Mexico for participating in a bar fight). Prior to the Hollywood brouhaha, Wahler had allegedly been in talks to appear on Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew (on VH1). It is unclear whether he will now be invited on the show.

What happens when someone like Wahler gets charged with multiple counts of driving under the influence in Beverly Hills (or elsewhere in California)? Well… first we must note that Wahler was only busted once in 2010. If a defendant gets convicted multiple times for Southern California DUI, charges obviously increase.

For a first-time misdemeanor offense, the court might impose penalties like 48 hours of jail time, a fine of $1,000 along with court costs, a one-year suspension of a California driver’s license, and compulsory DUI alcohol school.

A second time misdemeanor offender may see a minimum of four days in jail (perhaps more), a two-year license suspension, a serious increase in court costs and fines, and additional compulsory alcohol school along with tougher probation terms.

If you are busted for driving under the influence in Hollywood a third time within 10 years, your jail time jumps up to 120 days minimum, and all other punishments increase – including driver’s license suspension (three years), alcohol school, probation, etc.

A fourth time DUI within 10 years – even one that would ordinarily be considered a misdemeanor – may be elevated to a felony and can merit a minimum of 180 days in jail along with other severe punishments.

How can you or a loved one battle back against spurious charges of driving under the influence in Hollywood or elsewhere in Southern California?

Whether you believe that a breathalyzer test erroneously showed you to be DUI, or whether you admit to driving DUI but seek to minimize your punishments and maximize your chance for rehab, you likely need a professional Southern California DUI defense attorney to guide you.

May 24, 2010

Los Angeles DUI Experts Riveted by Tragic Case of Man Nabbed for Eighth DUI – after Just Getting Out of Jail for Killing Someone While DUI

by Michael Kraut

Bloggers who follow stories about driving under the influence in Southern California were glued to their computers last Monday afternoon following a case out of Franklin County, Vermont involving a man arrested for his eighth lifetime DUI.

The defendant, Douglas Gardner, was last arrested for driving under the influence in 1989, when he crashed head-on into a car and killed 20-year Billy Labier-Boucher. Gardener served a 20-year prison sentence. After securing release last month, Gardner almost immediately got back into trouble. He allegedly stole a Pontiac Aztek, drank two beers and a vodka, and veered off Route 78 in Highgate into a bog. The Vermont troopers who found him tested his blood alcohol content at 0.156% – nearly twice the legal limit for Southern California DUI of 0.08%, as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b).

The state attorney asked for bail to be set at $100,000, but Judge Greg Rainville went one step further and ordered Gardener held without bail. The Judge remarked: “you are a threat to the safety of the public… if I can’t stop you from driving, I can’t allow you on the streets.” The Judge’s ruling elicited enthusiasm from Pat Labier-Boucher, the mother of the man that Gardner killed in 1989. Labier-Boucher said: “it was like 20 years ago… it’s like reliving the whole thing again… I hope he is behind bars forever.”

Obviously, similar cases of manslaughter DUI in Glendale and elsewhere are tragic for many reasons. But what does local law say about Los Angeles DUI manslaughter charges?

According to Penal Code Section 191.5(a), in very serious cases, a defendant can be charged with “gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.” Prosecutors don’t necessarily have to go for this charge. But to prove gross vehicular manslaughter, prosecutors must meet a very high burden. First, you must show that the defendant drove under the influence of drugs or alcohol with a BAC of 0.08% or more. Second, you must show that the defendant committed a driving infraction, misdemeanor, or other legal act that could lead to death of another person. Third, you must show that the person committed this act with gross negligence. And fourth, you must show that the grossly negligent act led to the actual death of someone.

May 17, 2010

Warrant Singer Tagged for Second Southern California DUI in a Year

by Michael Kraut

Jani Lane, the 46-year old former front man of the ‘80s glam band Warrant, was arrested for driving under the influence in Southern California last Sunday at 3 in the morning after he plowed his black Infiniti into a parked car. Police who arrived on the scene found the ex-rocker — famous for hits like Cherry Pie, Heaven and Down Boys — in a bad state. Lane allegedly blew more than twice California’s legal limit of 0.08% on a breathalyzer test. According to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b), driving with a BAC of more than 0.08% is an offense punishable by jail time, among other things.

Ironically, the officer who arrested Lane in Woodland Hills was the same officer who arrested him in 2009. As this blog reported, his July 2009 arrest led to a plea of “no contest,” and Lane was convicted of a misdemeanor DUI. Fortunately, no one was hurt at the scene, but if Lane is convicted of this latest charge, he will obviously be in violation of his probation.

If you are arrested for multiple charges of DUI in Burbank or DUI in Glendale, what punishments should you expect above and beyond those “typical” for a first misdemeanor DUI?

Obviously, penalties depend upon the context of the arrest and whether complicating factors exist. For instance, did you injure somebody in either of your Los Angeles DUI arrests? If so, you could be charged instantly with a felony. This would lead to penalties such as substantial jail time and steep fines. Plus, a felony charge can make it difficult for you to find employment and impossible to vote in elections. But even if both Burbank DUI convictions were not complicated by any other factors, your penalties can still go up significantly.

For instance, your mandatory jail time will go up, as will your court cost and fines. Instead of a one year mandatory California driver’s license suspension, you will face a two year suspension. Your probation will likely be stricter. You will face longer mandatory alcohol school. And so on.

So if, like Jani Lane, you’ve been cited more than once for driving under the influence in Southern California, it’s in your interest to retain a reputable and trial-proven attorney.

April 12, 2010

Mindy McCready Back in the News — not for a Los Angeles DUI — but Rather for a Sex Tape Scandal

by Michael Kraut

Blogs that follow celebrity Los Angeles DUI arrests have seen a spike in interest in the criminal history of country singer Mindy McCready, thanks to new news reports suggesting that an hour-long sex tape starring the singer is set to be released.

McCready is no stranger to charges of driving under the influence. She was one of the main participants in 2010 Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew. Nashville Police stopped her in 2005 for suspicion of driving under the influence. Although the jury scrapped those DUI charges, they convicted McCready for driving on a suspended license. McCready has also been arrested in Arizona (for a battery of charges, including identity theft and hindering prosecution), Florida (for drug charge violations), and Tennessee (for probation violations).

The surfacing sex tape may give the beleaguered country singer a publicity boost as she releases “I’m Still Here,” her first country album in nearly a decade and a half.

McCready’s arrests have been scattered around the country, and she’s only technically been arrested for DUI once. But what happens to individuals — celebrities or not — who get charged with driving under the influence in Southern California more than one time?

As you might suspect, penalties increase for every additional Long Beach DUI arrest.

For instance, a first time Los Angeles DUI offender might be charged with a misdemeanor, for which the court can impose various penalties, including mandatory two full days (48 hours) in jail, a fine of $1,000 along with court costs, a six weeks minimum sentence of alcohol school, and a mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device. The court can also impose additional penalties and strict terms of probation.

If you get convicted of a second count of driving under the influence in Long Beach (within ten years), your mandatory minimum jail time goes up (4-10 days minimum), as does your mandatory alcohol school time (18 months). You will lose your license for two years (instead of one).

If you’re arrested a third and fourth time (or more) for Southern California DUI within a ten-year span, your penalties will become increasingly strict:

• longer jail sentences
• harsher probation terms
• longer driver’s license suspension
• possible upgrading to felony charges
• higher fines and court fees
• other punishments that the judge may devise
Dealing with charges of Long Beach DUI

Whether you’re facing your first or fifteenth DUI offense, it almost certainly behooves you to discuss your case in confidence with an experienced Los Angeles DUI attorney.

March 10, 2010

Warrant Slapped on Warrant Singer for Skipping Out on Los Angeles DUI Hearings

by Michael Kraut

As this blog reported, last June 17th, Jani Lane of the 80’s rock band Warrant was arrested for driving under the influence in Los Angeles. The “Cherry Pie” singer is back on the headlines once again after failing to show up for two hearings pertaining to his Los Angeles DUI probation. Jani%20Lane%20DUI%202.jpg

The 46-year old singer pled no contest to his misdemeanor L.A. DUI charge and got a relatively light sentence that included three months of alcohol school, one month of community service, and three months of probation. He was due in court on February 23rd, 2010, but he didn’t show up. The judge rescheduled his appearance for February 24th, but Lane again failed to show. According to the website TMZ.com, Lane’s lawyer said that the singer is in the hospital for unknown reasons, and that he will not show up in court until next week.

The judge in Lane’s case has actually issued a warrant for the lead singer of the band Warrant – an irony not lost on Lane’s fans and snarky commentators in the media and blogosphere.

Lane’s DUI in Burbank accident occurred at the corner of Topanga and Ventura Boulevards. At the time, he got out of jail by posing a $30,000 bail. The minor traffic accident did not result in any serious injuries to any parties, fortunately.

But what if it had?

Two key sections of California Vehicle Code stipulate punishments for individuals who injure others while driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in California. These sections are 23153(a) and 23153(b).

23153(a)

This section says that if you drive DUI and cause an accident that leads to someone being injured, this will elevate an ordinary misdemeanor DUI charge to a felony DUI charge, assuming that the injury was directly or indirectly caused by the DUI driver’s use of drugs and/or alcohol.

23153(b)

This section says something quite similar. It says that if you operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) exceeding the state’s legal limit of 0.08%, and then you hit someone and cause an injury or otherwise violate the law and cause an injury, this can be charged as a felony. 23153(b) also lays out the punishments that can be imposed, which range from jail time to forced restitution to a victim (and/or the victim’s family) to steep fines and court costs.

What should you do if you or a family member has been charged with driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in Southern California?

A good attorney can be immeasurably helpful. Without excellent legal representation, you could wind up with much steeper penalties than you might otherwise.

October 29, 2009

Mel Gibson Finally Puts His Southern California DUI Behind Him

by Michael Kraut

On Tuesday, movie star and director Mel Gibson finally saw his July 2006 Southern California DUI conviction expunged from his record. Gibson’s arrest in the summer of 2006 riveted the nation after Gibson allegedly threw an anti-Semitic tantrum subsequent to his being taken into custody, in which he unleashed a fusillade of insults and racist remarks, including saying that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” Mel%20Gibson%20DUI.jpg

Judge Lawrence Mira consented to clear Gibson of his Los Angeles DUI charge because the actor/director had conformed to the terms of his probation, which included attending AA meetings, paying nominal fines, and avoiding further arrests for driving under the influence.

Had Gibson consulted a knowledgeable Los Angeles DUI lawyer after he had been pulled over on PCH for driving around 85 mph, he likely would have been advised against behaving rudely and aggressively towards the deputy officer who made the arrest.

That being said, being courteous to an arresting officer does not mean being compliant or submissive. In fact, if you’re overly forthcoming about your activities, you can exacerbate your legal woes. Admitting to “only having had a few drinks,” for instance, can significantly complicate your case.

Under what conditions can a suspect refuse an alcohol test? The law is murkier than most people realize. You can refuse under certain circumstances; but under other circumstances, refusal can constitute a criminal offense. For instance, if you’re on probation for driving under the influence of Los Angeles, or if you’ve just been arrested, you must take a test. (And if you’ve been arrested under suspicion of drug use, you may also have to take a urine test.)

You can also be penalized if you delay taking a test. That said, if the conduct of the arresting officer contributed to or caused the delay, then said delay may not actually constitute a refusal, legally speaking. If the police do not advise a suspect about penalties for refusal, the court can choose to ignore a refusal, even if one did in fact take place. According to Southern California law, arresting officers can obtain blood samples for BAC testing by force if need be. For instance, if a suspect has passed out at the wheel and has evinced signs of DUI, an officer can take a sample — even in spite of the suspect’s unconsciousness.

For help navigating the complexities that have resulted from your DUI arrest, turn to attorney Michael Kraut. For many years, attorney Kraut worked as a DUI prosecutor in Los Angeles. He knows how to critically dissect prosecutorial arguments and brings to bear a tremendous and detailed knowledge of how Los Angeles DUI cases are fought. He also boasts an impressive academic pedigree (Harvard Law School).

October 21, 2009

Montana Senator Hit with Felony Charges For Boating Under the Influence — Case May Merit More News Coverage than Even Many Celebrity Southern California DUI Matters

by Michael Kraut

It’s a case that rivals a celebrity Los Angeles DUI escapade — and it took place in Montana, of all places. At the center of the storm is Senator Greg Barkus (R- Montana) who, on the night of August 7th, allegedly drove a boat into a rocky coastline at speeds approaching 45 miles per hour.

Senator Barkus (along with his wife, fellow Congressman Denny Rehberg, and two staffers) were all hurt in the accident. Prosecutors have revealed that Senator Barkus’ blood sample tested at 0.16 percent nearly two hours after the crash occurred. That’s twice Montana’s legal limit for driving (0.08 percent). The senator has been tagged for DUI previously. In 2004, he pled guilty to driving under the influence in the city of Polson, Montana.

If convicted of felony charges against him, the senator could face up to ten years in prison — for each of the three charges — and he could face tens or thousands of dollars worth of fines. He is due to appear in Flathead District Court in Montana on October 22nd for his arraignment.

As a veteran Southern California DUI defense attorney would likely have told the senator, building a rock-ribbed legal defense in a case as complex and public as this requires careful investigation. For instance, a deep analysis might lead the senator to challenge the validity of the results of his blood test. (According to a report in The Billings Gazette, the senator’s passengers did not (at the time) believe him to be intoxicated. Another report revealed that a political rival (a Democrat state representative) ran the lab where the senator’s blood sample was first sent to be analyzed.)

Contrary to many people’s beliefs, blood tests often yield unclear or even biased results. Many factors can cause the test to indicate a higher BAC level than the subject actually might have had. For instance, the chemicals inside the test may have been expired or poorly preserved. The sample may have been misidentified, mishandled, mistested, misinterpreted, or stored improperly. Problems with sterility, refrigeration, and contamination can all influence results.

Of course, given that courts generally consider blood tests to be more reliable than breathalyzer and urine tests, it’s almost always a good idea to retain a top notch Southern California DUI attorney to assist with your case. If you have been arrested and charged with DUI in Los Angeles, connect today with Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Attorney Kraut is a Harvard Law School grad and a former LA District Attorney with a tremendous track record. Since he once prosecuted DUI cases for a living, he understands better than most how to shore up potentially shaky defenses and aggressively battle back.

October 19, 2009

Eighty-Nine Year Old Hit with DUI and Manslaughter Charges — Case May Hold Lessons for People Charged With Driving Under the Influence in Los Angeles

by Michael Kraut

According to a September 30th article in The Oregonian, Warren Edwards, an 89 year-old from Vale, Oregon, has been booked on charges of manslaughter and DUI after he struck and killed 60 year-old David Messer on a stretch of Oregon’s Route 26 West. Although the incident occurred far from the hustle and bustle of Southern California’s tangled freeways, Los Angeles DUI experts are paying close attention to the details, particularly since the defendant is of such advanced age. The Oregon State Police have alleged that neither driver was wearing a seat belt at the time and that Edwards did not have a driver’s license on his person.

If you have been involved in a head-on collusion that resulted in fatalities or serious injuries, it makes sense to speak with a Southern California DUI attorney as soon as possible regarding your legal rights and responsibilities.

Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is defined in California by penal code statute 191.5 (a). If you were drinking prior to your crash, and someone involved (in your vehicle, in other vehicle, a pedestrian, etc.) ended up dying, you may feel tremendous guilt. You may even feel so defeated that you’re reluctant to put up a vigorous defense. However, it’s critical to act now — both for your future and for the service of justice — to test the prosecution’s case.

Often, key evidence that potentially could exonerate you gets overlooked. For instance, maybe the sobriety tests used to ascertain your BAC level were biased, mishandled, or faulty. A probing investigation can turn up exculpatory evidence. Or maybe the driver of the other vehicle was intoxicated or negligent. Alternately, maybe your vehicle had a mechanical problem that made safe handling more difficult.

A savvy Los Angeles DUI defense attorney, such as Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers, may be able to poke holes in the prosecution’s arguments. Attorney Kraut spent years working for the city of Los Angeles prosecuting DUI cases. He now draws upon his vast and deep experience to build intelligent, forward thinking arguments for Southern California DUI defendants.

October 14, 2009

NYPD Officer Charged with DUI Manslaughter — Case May Hold Relevance for Similar Cases of DUI in Southern California

by Michael Kraut

According to an October 2nd article in the New York Times, a Brooklyn grand jury is set to hear testimony in the case of an NYPD officer who struck and killed a young woman with his jeep, allegedly while under the influence of alcohol. Experts in Southern California DUI law are closely following the matter.

According to the Times article, Officer Andrew Kelly drove into a 32 year-old woman, Vionique Valnord, as she was exiting a wedding party. Officer Kelly was off duty at the time, and he refused to take a blood alcohol test at the scene. Under subpoena, he was compelled to take a blood test seven hours later; the test revealed that he had no alcohol in his system. Nevertheless, eye-witnesses have claimed that Officer Kelly exhibited signs of intoxication, including “red watery eyes” and “slurred speech.” The prosecution also alleges that Officer Kelly’s jeep smelled of alcohol. The matter has elicited public outrage and Mayor Bloomberg himself has planned to attend Ms. Valnord’s wake.

Given the ambiguous evidence regarding whether or not Officer Kelly was intoxicated, it’s unclear how the prosecution will make its case. As a practiced Los Angeles DUI attorney might tell you, roadside sobriety tests and blood alcohol tests alike are notoriously unreliable.

Most people understand that blood, urine, and breathalyzer tests can be biased by improper handling, misinterpretation, and design defects. But few realize that even so-called “obvious” signs of intoxication may not be so obvious after all. When police pull suspects over for driving under the influence in Southern California, they usually look for symptoms, such as:

• Lack of physical coordination
• Careless or reckless driving
• Mumbling speech
• Odor of alcohol on or around the suspect
• Eyes that are bloodshot
• Slurry speech
• Poor kinesthetic awareness
• Disheveled appearance
• Changing stories about what events took place and in what order they took place

Taken together, these signs can be extremely suggestive. However, most DUI examinations yield less than conclusive results. Any number of factors can potentially explain why, for instance, a driver has watery eyes and slurred speech. Perhaps he or she is just fatigued. Or perhaps he or she is having a bad reaction to a medication. Similarly, some people are more or less coordinated than others. This doesn’t mean that people who exhibit these symptoms are not intoxicated. (Nor, conversely, does it mean that individuals who fail to exhibit these symptoms are not DUI.)

The general point here is that, to make an accurate assessment of a suspect’s level of intoxication, one must scrutinize other possible hypotheses that could explain the symptoms.

Of course, challenging charges of DUI in Los Angeles — particularly in cases where other people have been hurt or killed — can be monumentally difficult. That’s why many defendants turn to expert Los Angeles DUI attorneys, like Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Prior to becoming a criminal defense lawyer, Attorney Kraut spent years as a prosecutor for Southern California DUI cases. His unique vantage allows him to construct strategic options that many attorneys would never think of, simply because they’ve never argued for the other side before.