The 46-year old singer pled no contest to his misdemeanor L.A. DUI charge and got a relatively light sentence that included three months of alcohol school, one month of community service, and three months of probation. He was due in court on February 23rd, 2010, but he didn’t show up. The judge rescheduled his appearance for February 24th, but Lane again failed to show. According to the website TMZ.com, Lane’s lawyer said that the singer is in the hospital for unknown reasons, and that he will not show up in court until next week.

The judge in Lane’s case has actually issued a warrant for the lead singer of the band Warrant – an irony not lost on Lane’s fans and snarky commentators in the media and blogosphere.

Lane’s DUI in Burbank accident occurred at the corner of Topanga and Ventura Boulevards. At the time, he got out of jail by posing a $30,000 bail. The minor traffic accident did not result in any serious injuries to any parties, fortunately.

But what if it had?

Two key sections of California Vehicle Code stipulate punishments for individuals who injure others while driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in California. These sections are 23153(a) and 23153(b).

23153(a)

This section says that if you drive DUI and cause an accident that leads to someone being injured, this will elevate an ordinary misdemeanor DUI charge to a felony DUI charge, assuming that the injury was directly or indirectly caused by the DUI driver’s use of drugs and/or alcohol.

23153(b)

This section says something quite similar. It says that if you operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) exceeding the state’s legal limit of 0.08%, and then you hit someone and cause an injury or otherwise violate the law and cause an injury, this can be charged as a felony. 23153(b) also lays out the punishments that can be imposed, which range from jail time to forced restitution to a victim (and/or the victim’s family) to steep fines and court costs.

What should you do if you or a family member has been charged with driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in Southern California?

A good attorney can be immeasurably helpful. Without excellent legal representation, you could wind up with much steeper penalties than you might otherwise.

It is uncertain whether the 55-year-old Senator’s male companion (who was with him at the time of the arrest) was in any way linked with the Senator romantically.

Following his DUI arrest, Ashburn issued the following statement: “I am deeply sorry for my actions and offer no excuse for my poor judgment. I accept complete responsibility for my conduct and I am prepared to accept the consequences for what I did.”

Ashburn faces a primary challenge from another Republican for re-election to State Senate. According to various news reports, Ashburn has been charged with driving under the influence in Southern California as well as driving with a BAC above the state’s legal limit of 0.08%.

The News in Depth

Whether you are stopped for driving under the influence in Long Beach, Pasadena, Bakersfield, or Sacramento, two applicable laws are California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) and 23152(b).

The first section, 23152(a), defines what it means to be under the influence and talks about what might happen to you if you get convicted of the crime. The law stipulates that you could:

o lose your California drivers license
o be forced to pay restitution, court costs and other fees
o be jailed for a period of time
o receive points on your DMV record

California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) stipulates that if you drive with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher, this constitutes DUI, and you could receive the same punishments stipulated in Section 23152(a). In the case of Senator Roy Ashburn, from the news reports, it sounds like both of these Vehicle Code Sections might be applicable.

So what should you do if you have been arrested for DUI in Long Beach, Burbank, Beverly Hills, Sacramento, or elsewhere in the state?

Most defendants should connect with a credentialed, highly regarded Southern California DUI defense attorney ASAP.

The 27-year old Jackson had been arrested in January with a BAC of 0.17% (California’s legal limit is 0.08%). The January ’09 arrest was actually his second Southern California DUI. He was busted in June 2006 and convicted for that DUI -- netting him a $1,750 fine and five years of probation. This time, he did not get off so easily. In addition to a concomitant fine (of $2,408) and another five years probation, the wide receiver will have to do 15 days of community service and will likely be suspended by the National Football League for at least two games.

In light of recent comments Jackson made in the radio interview, during which he taunted his prosecutors, many analysts are saying that Jackson is getting off pretty easy. For a comparison, the City Attorney’s Office had requested the Judge to give Jackson 180 days in jail -- also known as “substantial custody.” City attorneys were also miffed because Jackson managed to pull off a string of continuances that allowed him to delay his Southern California DUI sentencing until after the NFL season. (Nevertheless, San Diego’s City Attorney did not oppose the two continuances when they were filed.)

The Jackson sentence may or may not be an aberration, depending on who you speak to. But how do the sentencing guidelines differ for first and second time Burbank DUI offenses?

Sentencing can depend on a host of factors, including the context of the DUI arrest, whether or not the defendant cooperates with prosecutors, whether anyone was injured during, and so forth.

That said, typical first time penalties for Southern California DUI include:

• 48 hours in jail with six months maximum imprisonment
• Mandatory installation of Interlock Ignition Device (IID) -- this is a new punishment that went into effect in January 2010
• Six weeks minimum DUI alcohol school (nine months maximum)
• A suspension of California driver’s license for a full year
• $1,000 fine
• Court costs (often can be significantly higher than $1,000)
• Strict terms of formal probation for misdemeanor DUI offenders

Second time DUI offenders typically can get the following penalties:

• Jail time of four to ten days (minimum); maximum six months
• Two year suspension of California drivers’ license
• 18 months minimum DUI alcohol school (30 months maximum)
• Imposed installation of IID
• Fines and court costs which can be much higher than first time DUI fines
• Probation terms which can be much stricter than terms for first time violators

For help analyzing your Burbank DUI defense, you may need to turn to an experienced attorney.

According to Washington State Troopers, Harris had been driving on a suspended license and had gotten involved in a hit and run accident prior to his arrest. After a motorist reported an out-of-control driver on interstate 5, the police ID’d Harris’ vehicle and, using aerial assistance, pulled him over. Harris was arrested at the scene and charged with hit and run as well as a DUI.

Fortunately, no one was reportedly injured in the earlier hit and run accident, and Harris himself seems to have escaped uninjured as well, although he remains behind bars as of the publishing of this blog post. Harris’ situation does raise some interesting issues, however.

For instance, what would happen if someone drove DUI in Pasadena on the 5 Freeway and got involved in a hit and run accident that actually hurt someone else?

If you commit a hit and run DUI in Pasadena, you might be charged by prosecutors for violating California Vehicle Code Sections 23153(a) and/or 23153(b). These state laws stipulate that anyone who injures another person in a DUI crash can have his charge raised from a simple misdemeanor to a felony, which is a much more serious charge. If your BAC level is above 0.08%, and you hurt another person in a DUI crash (hit and run or not), your punishments can include forced restitution to the injured victim and/or victim’s family, a lengthy prison sentence, severe fines and court costs, hiked up insurance rates, strict probation terms, mandatory installation of an interlock ignition device, and so forth.

Obviously, defendants would like to avoid (or at the very least plead down) these charges. But without a sophisticated and experienced attorney who understands how prosecutors charge people for driving under the influence in Pasadena, you could run into serious trouble -- even if exonerating facts are on your side.

Explore Your Options

On February 8th, the goaltender blasted his red Ferrari down a Scottsdale road at 70 miles per hour -- more than 25 miles per hour over the speed limit. Local police pulled over the 37-year-old and gave him a field sobriety test after noticing the odor of alcohol on him. Khabibulin was subsequently arrested and charged with DUI and speeding. According to the General Manager of the Oilers, “Nikolai has been fully cooperative with the authorities.”

Khabibulin, who signed a $15 million contract with the Edmonton Oilers in 2009, has been out since mid November thanks to a lower back injury. The Oilers have struggled without his finesse -- racking up the worst record in the league (19-36-6). (For comparison, Khabibulin’s record was 7-2-9 with just over three goals scored against on average for the '09-'10 hockey season.)

When police officers make DUI stops -- whether they do so in Scottsdale or Southern California -- what kinds of tests do they conduct?

Beverly Hills DUI police typically handle roadside stops ritualistically. In other words, they adhere tightly to a pre-scripted procedure:

The first kind of Southern California DUI field sobriety test usually given is the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. This is an eye exam designed to see whether the driver can track an object across a field of view. If the eye bounces around, this might indicate that the suspect is DUI.

The following test is the walk the line test. This is a balance test. A suspect must step nine paces in two directions over a line (such as a yellow dividing line). If she falls over, that might indicate she has been driving under the influence in Beverly Hills.

The next test is the one-leg stand test. This is another balance test. The driver stands on one foot for half a minute. Again, if he or she loses balance, this might indicate DUI.

The next test is the Rhomberg test, in which a driver tilts his head back and counts from 1 to 30. Again, a loss of balance might indicate DUI.
Officers can also employ coordination tests, such as the finger to the nose test.

Finally, mental coordination tests may be employed as well -- such as reverse counting tests.

Just because you fail a Beverly Hills DUI field sobriety test doesn't necessarily mean that you will be convicted. But you may need solid legal representation to help you build a good defense.

On Tuesday, Lumpkin -- who had been decorated with over three dozen traffic offenses over the past 20 years, according to the Chicago Sun-Times – plowed his van into six-year-old Jada Washington, killing her. Washington’s aunt, Tiuette Richardson, was severely hurt as well.

Despite all his traffic offenses (his latest occurred just weeks ago on January 31st, when he blew through a stop sign), amazingly, Lumpkin still had an Illinois drivers’ license. According to the Chicago Tribune, “The court records provide little information about why the tickets were dropped, but it could have been a lack of evidence, the failure of police officers to show up in court or any number of other things.”

Lumpkin has been charged with two counts of aggravated DUI as well as reckless homicide.

The laws concerning DUI murder in Southern California differ somewhat from the applicable Illinois laws. If Lumpkin had a hit and killed a six-year-old while driving under the influence in Long Beach, for instance, he could be charged with Gross Vehicular Manslaughter while Intoxicated (CA Penal Code Section 191.5(a)).

To win a case like this, prosecutors would have to show four things:

1. Lumpkin was under the influence of alcohol or drugs and drove with a BAC of 0.08% or higher.

2. While driving DUI in Long Beach (or anywhere else in Southern California), Lumpkin committed a misdemeanor, traffic offense or other act that could lead to death.

3. Lumpkin performed this misdemeanor, infraction or act with what’s known as “gross negligence” -- a standard of carelessness that’s beyond ordinary inattention or bad judgment.

4. The gross negligence led to the death of the six-year-old girl.

Cases of Gross Vehicular Manslaughter while DUI in Southern California can become incredibly complicated and can stretch out over months, if not years.

The consequences of a less than exact defense could lead to extreme punishments. So, if you or a loved one stands accused of a DUI in Long Beach -- whether you are contending with a simple misdemeanor or a complex charge like vehicular manslaughter -- you likely need competent and experienced legal counsel.

A car traveling eastbound on Sherman Way attempted a U-turn, when an oncoming truck plowed into it, knocking the car onto a nearby curb. The truck, meanwhile, slammed into a Ford Mustang parked nearby. The truck driver -- along with his passenger -- fled the scene, but both men were apprehended and arrested shortly thereafter for trying to break into someone’s residence.

The truck driver got tagged for a felony hit and run charge; he is currently being investigated for a misdemeanor DUI charge. Meanwhile, the 20-something-year-old woman who had been driving the car got taken to hospital for minor injuries. Reports suggest that neither her, nor her passengers, suffered any life-threatening injuries. Nevertheless, the woman was hit with a felony Los Angeles DUI charge.

Laforce had this to say about the accident: “it was ugly… they are lucky they are alive.”

In this Burbank DUI instance, fortunately no one got seriously injured or killed. But what happens if someone dies in a Southern California DUI crash? What kinds of charges might a driver face?

The answer, obviously, depends on the circumstances of the accident. California Penal Code Section 191.5(a) describes the charge of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. To prove this kind of charge, prosecutors must show four key things:
1) The person drove a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.08% or higher; or otherwise clearly drove under the influence of a drug;
2) The person committed a driving infraction or unlawful act -- such as a misdemeanor -- that could potentially cause someone to die;
3) The driver not only committed this unlawful act or infraction, but he or she did so with gross negligence;
4) This gross negligence led to someone’s death.

DUI murder charges (a.k.a. Watson murders) carry even stiffer penalties and harsher jail sentences than do charges of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

Whether you’re facing a (relatively) minor misdemeanor Burbank DUI charge, or you’ve been arrested for gross vehicular manslaughter while under the influence, you are entitled to a sound and competent defense. Given how much is at stake, it makes sense to invest in high quality legal representation.

Here is the story, as reported in The Daily Breeze:

#1) On January 31, a car collided with two other vehicles at the intersection of Sepulveda Blvd. and Manhattan Beach Blvd.

#2) The driver fled the scene and abandoned his vehicle at a nearby Arco Gas Station parking lot.

#3) Police called in to investigate discovered that the driver was one of their own -- a fellow Manhattan Beach officer.

#4) Instead of arresting their cohort for Southern California DUI and hit and run, the officers did not issue any report or make any arrests.

#5) News of this dereliction of duty reached the Manhattan Beach Chief of Police, Rod Uyeda, the next day.

#6) Uyeda quickly alerted the LA County Sheriff’s Department to conduct an internal investigation, and he issued a public statement to the community to reassure them that the actions of the few independently-minded police officers should not be construed as indicating that the Manhattan Beach Police Department would condone or tolerate bad behavior.

Fortunately, the two other drivers hit on January 31st suffered only minor injuries (and some property damage to their vehicles). The Southern California DUI hit and run cover up comes on the heels of a similar incident last September that took place in Torrence at the corner of Robert Road and Pacific Coast Highway. (A Torrence police sergeant drove under the influence of alcohol, hit another vehicle, and sped away from the scene.)

California Vehicle Code Sections 23153(a) and 23153(b) stipulate that it is a violation of California law to injure another person while driving under the influence of narcotics or alcohol. If you hurt another person while driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher, you can be slapped with a felony charge and face life changing penalties, including jail time, high court costs and fines, drivers license suspension, forced restitution to victims of the injury, and more.

If you’ve been hit with a charge of driving under the influence in Los Angeles, you’re likely feeling anxious, nervous, and confused. Take proactive steps to gather yourself and begin to craft an appropriate defense to the charges against you.

Gibson’s arrest on Pacific Coast Highway on July 28, 2006 was relatively “ordinary” as far as Beverly Hills DUI arrests go. He was driving more than 40 miles over the speed limit with a BAC that later tested at 0.12% (California’s legal limit is 0.08%), when he was pulled over and arrested by Malibu police deputy James Mee. Gibson allegedly launched into an anti-Semitic rant, behavior that he later admitted was “despicable.”

Gibson and his publicists worked hard to put that memorable Southern California DUI arrest in the past. But old wounds opened on Wednesday February 3rd when the actor lashed out against Chicago television reporter Dean Richards (WGN TV), after Richards brought up the DUI during a TV interview about Gibson’s latest film, Edge of Darkness. Richards asked the actor about his “drinking problems” and “the anti Semitic rant.” Gibson shot back “that was almost four years ago, dude. I’ve moved on. I guess you haven’t.” Then, Gibson called the reporter an a****** -- apparently unaware that the cameras were still rolling. (Gibson and his publicists have since done another round of damage control to keep this latest bit of hostility under wraps.)

Any mention of Gibson’s arrest would be incomplete without a brief discussion of the penalties typically doled out for misdemeanor Southern California DUI. Even if it’s only your first time pulled over for driving under the influence, you can still be subject to any one (and possibly even all) of the following punishments:

• Six weeks of DUI alcohol school (maximum nine months)
• Strict terms of probation for release. You may have to check in with a California probation officer periodically and adhere to other conditions and terms to get released.
• One year suspension of California drivers’ license -- no restricted license allowed
• A $1,000 fine
• Court costs (which can be significantly more than $1,000)
• Mandatory jail time of two full days in custody (48 hours); maximum half a year in jail
• Mandatory installation of interlock ignition device (IID) in your vehicle. (For instance, had Gibson been arrested for a Southern California DUI today instead of in 2006, he would have been compelled by law to install an IID in his 2006 Lexus LS 430.)

How can you effectively construct a defense so you won’t have to endure these (many) penalties for driving under the influence in Burbank or elsewhere in Los Angeles?

Lawyers abound in Southern California who can nominally do this kind of defense work. But unless you're very careful about choosing, you can easily get second class representation, which could indirectly mean more stringent punishments and a longer, more costly road to rehabilitation. Fortunately, you have options…

• According to the Orange County Register, in 2009, 11 people died in DUI related accidents - more than 3 times the average for Southern California DUI deaths. Also last year, 160 DUI crashes were reported in CA - twice the daily average.

• The DUI spike is a known and serious problem. The Automobile Club of Southern California recently analyzed crash data and found that DUI crashes on Super Bowl Sunday leap 27% (220 people hurt/killed in DUI crashes vs. 174 people hurt/killed in DUI crashes on an average day in CA.)

• In Los Angeles proper, the spike is even spikier. We see a whopping 33% increase in Los Angeles DUI crashes/deaths on average for Super Bowl Sunday (72 people hurt/killed vs. 54 hurt/killed on a normal day).

Fortunately, the majority of Burbank DUI arrests and auto accidents end without injury to any party. Here in California, injury DUIs are covered by California Vehicle Code Section 23153(a) and 23153(b). Let’s dive into these two laws to get a better understanding of what they prohibit and how the mete out punishments.

According to 23153(a), a driver who would ordinarily be charged with a misdemeanor Beverly Hills DUI can be hit with a felony charge if she injures another person in an accident that can be clearly linked to her alcohol/drug use.

Section 23153(b) says that someone who drives with a BAC of 0.08% or more and who then violates California traffic laws and directly or indirectly hurts another person can be sent to prison. This section also lays out other punishments that can be imposed, such as court fines, jacked up insurance rates, and forced restitution to the victim or the family of the victim.

That being said, just because you're arrested for driving under the influence in West Hollywood (or elsewhere in Southern California, such as Long Beach or Burbank), and someone got hurt in the accident doesn’t mean that you will be slapped with a felony charge. For the prosecution to succeed with a case against someone for violating 23153(a) or 23153(b), they must show that the driver violated traffic laws, behaved negligently, and caused the accident.

For instance, if you drove DUI (BAC of 0.08% or above), but the other driver caused the accident: you can still get a misdemeanor DUI, but you won’t likely get a felony DUI. Likewise, if you drive DUI and caused an accident, but you did not violate any traffic laws or act in a negligent way then you will be susceptible to a misdemeanor charge but likely not to a felony.

To sort everything out, it helps to work hand in hand with an attorney who has lots of experience.

Whether you're pulled over for a Long Beach DUI on the 405 South, or a Burbank DUI on the 101, the California Highway Patrol administers similar kinds of field sobriety tests. What are the typical field sobriety tests (FSTs), and how do they purport to work? Here's a quick primer:

Gaze tests

The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test determines pupil coordination. An officer tracks the eye movement of a suspect following an object or a light.

Balancing tests

Common balancing tests include the One Leg Stand test, the Walk the Line test, and the Rhomberg test. With the One Leg Stand test, a driver is asked to stand on one leg. If he or she tips over, this might indicate DUI. The Walk the Line test is perhaps the most famous Southern California DUI field sobriety test. A suspect must walk nine paces back and forth on a straight line (e.g. a highway divider line). If the suspect "falls off," then he or she might be suspected. Finally, the Rhomberg test involves leaning back and counting to 30. Again, tipping over might indicate intoxication.

Coordination tests

The so-called Finger to the Nose test is perhaps the most common. In this exam, a driver closes her eyes and attempts to touch her nose after extending her arms. If the driver cannot "find" her nose, then DUI may be suspected.

Officers will also look for indicators of demeanor and constitution. For instance, let's say police pull over a person on suspicion of driving under the influence in Long Beach on the 405 South. In addition to performing the FSTs, officers will also look for signs like slow speech response, impaired motor skills, disheveled appearance, watery eyes, and general lack of coordination.

If you or someone you love has been stopped and arrested for a Long Beach DUI, you may need serious legal assistance to avoid dramatic punishments. The city does not want for lawyers who are willing to tackle Los Angeles DUI defense work. But take the time to find a lawyer who has talent, experience, and a proven trial track record.

This morning, Maualuga Tweeted to his Twitter followers about his remorse over what happened. He vowed to "do everything in my power to gain ur trust back! I will definitely learn from this!"

Whether you're pulled over for DUI in Covington, Kentucky or DUI in Pasadena, California, the consequences of conviction can be life changing. Here in Southern California, the basic relevant laws are encapsulated in two sections of the California Vehicle Code: sections 23152 (a) and (b). The first section stipulates that a driver pulled over by the police while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can be placed under arrest and charged with a misdemeanor or felony. If the Court convicts, he or she will face punishments like jail time, license suspension, points on the license, and fines and court costs. As of January 1, 2010, even a first-time Pasadena DUI offender will be required to install something called an interlock ignition device (IID) in his or her vehicle. This mechanism prevents a driver from starting the engine unless he or she blows into a Breathalyzer like device first.

Section 23152 (b) stipulates that a driver who operates a vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration of greater than 0.08% can be arrested for DUI. Officers use a number of tests to determine this BAC number -- including urine analysis, breathalyzers, and blood tests. Each of these common methods has pluses and minuses.

If you're arrested for a Pasadena DUI, it can help to discuss your matter with a qualified and proven lawyer. After all, perhaps your BAC test was biased, inaccurate, or improperly interpreted. The only way to build a superior defense is to analyze all relevant facts in context. Most Pasadena DUI attorneys spend their entire careers only arguing for defendants. As a result, they may be blinded to certain solutions.

Fergusson’s attorneys had argued that the marine got PTSD on his tour of duty in Iraq and that therefore he should be let off with a more lenient sentence. In the end, Judge Ronald Bauer of Superior Court agreed with the Deputy District Attorney’s recommendation of 15 years to life for the DUI manslaughter. (The family of the victim had asked for a 21 year to life term.)

The distinction between Southern California DUI vehicular manslaughter and DUI murder can be subtle. Most non experts assume that charges of vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, and DUI murder are interchangeable. But in fact they are extremely different. They carry different penalties and require different burdens of proof.

In California, a vehicular manslaughter charge can be filed if a driver causes a traffic accident due to negligence, gross negligence, or the commission of a traffic infraction. Whether or not you were under the influence when the accident happened is immaterial for this charge.

The charge of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is far more serious -- pursuant to penal code section 191.5(a), the prosecution must prove four points in order for this charge to stick:

1) The suspect was driving under the influence in Southern California with a BAC level of 0.08 percent or more.
2) The driver committed an infraction, misdemeanor, or other act that could lead to death.
3) The infraction, unlawful act or misdemeanor could lead to someone’s death “with gross negligence.”
4) The grossly negligent actions of the driver were the cause of the death of somebody.

DUI murder charges are even more serious. These charges are often called “Watson murders.” If convicted, an individual can face 15 + years to life in jail. Watson murder charges are typically only brought in extreme cases. For instance, if the suspect has numerous DUI convictions and then gets behind the wheel while under the influence and kills someone, he or she might be subjected to a Watson murder charge.

If you or someone you know or love has been charged with vehicular manslaughter, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, or DUI murder in Southern California, you likely need a solid, well versed attorney to represent you.

Starr, 43, has been arrested multiple times for drug and alcohol violations in cities as far flung as Salt Lake City, L.A., Seattle, and Pasadena. In 1994, he was booked at a Houston airport for possession of narcotics. In September 28, 2008, he was pulled over for drug possession in Los Angeles. In 2005, Starr was arrested in Seattle for yanking the hood ornament off of a man’s car.

If you're caught driving under the influence in Pasadena, what exactly happens to you? How do the police know whether or not you're over the legal limit?

One method the police use to determine your blood alcohol content (BAC) level is the blood test. Whether you're arrested for DUI in Pasadena, DUI in Hollywood, or DUI anywhere else in Southern California, the blood test must be administered in a very precise manner. First, a sample is taken from the vein of the suspect. Then a qualified technician must ID it and transport it for further testing. The results must then be reported and interpreted. The blood sample is mixed with certain chemicals to prevent clotting, and police can choose from one of three acceptable methods to test BAC concentration.

Are blood tests always right?

Like breathalyzer tests, blood tests can yield what are known as false positives -- that is, they can give a reading above the CA legal limit of 0.08% even if a suspect was actually BELOW that number.

Unfortunately, many Pasadena DUI suspects do not realize how fallible these tests can be. At any number of nodes in the process, problems can occur that can skew results and lead to false positives. For instance:

• sample is not kept sterile;
• the preservative chemical mixture is improperly mixed;
• the sample is not refrigerated correctly or kept at the right temperature;
• the person who takes the blood sample does not have proper training or licensing;
• the alcohol used on the skin to sterilize contaminates the sample;
• the police mix up samples or improperly interpret results

So how can you prevent a false positive from getting you convicted of DUI in Pasadena? Your best bet is almost always to solicit the services of a trial-proven attorney who specializes in DUI defense.

In addition to his January 2008 DUI charge, the troubled receiver is also grappling with a second Southern California DUI charge; his BAC level in that case was allegedly twice the CA legal limit of 0.08%. He got a continuance on this charge last week, but if he's ultimately convicted, the NFL could suspend him.

What happens when you're arrested multiple times for driving under the influence in Southern California?

Obviously, penalties increase. But how, specifically? And how might these increased threats impact defense strategies?

In one sense, every case is different. Sentencing can depend on eclectic factors such as:

* the lawyers involved
* the judge you get
* the arguments you make
* the context of the DUI arrest
* your level of contrition
* etc

That said, mandatory punishments for first time misdemeanor DUI offenses differ from from mandatory multiple DUI punishments in some key ways.

First-time punishments often include:

* CA driver's license suspension
* $1000+ fine
* Additional costs levied (can vastly exceed the $1000 fine)
* 48 hours behind bars (six months maximum)
* Forced DUI alcohol school
* Mandatory insulation of an interlock ignition device (IID) -- even first-time misdemeanor DUI convicts must install an IID, subsequent to the law that went into effect on January 1, 2010
* Probation and other court imposed terms of release

But if, within 10 years, you get convicted of two+ charges of DUI in Southern California, possible penalties can increase in the following ways.

* Fines: whereas with a first-time misdemeanor DUI, the maximum fine is $1000; with multiple DUIs, this number can go up -- way up.
* License suspension: a second DUI nets you a two-year suspension. A third DUI nets you a 18 month suspension. And so forth.
* Minimum jail time: A second DUI leads to a mandatory minimum sentence of 4-10 days behind bars. A 3rd DUI leads to a mandatory minimum of 120 days. A fourth DUI leads to a mandatory 180 days in jail. And that's all just for misdemeanor convictions.
* Minimum time spent in alcohol school also goes up with each conviction.
* Terms of probation can stiffen with each new DUI conviction.

Building a stout defense to Los Angeles DUI, Long Beach DUI, or Whittier DUI charges is not easy, even for veteran defense attorneys.